Guest post by blog reader J. Vanne. Thanks J for the well written article!
I'll discuss some of the videos in our next post, pointing out some things you guys should keep in mind.
FerFAL
The
utterly horrific Colorado shooting is still being processed, as I
write, into the collective conscience of America. First, clearly the
care for the wounded and survivors must be paramount for everyone. Let
us all labor with one goal to that end at present. Once this is over,
however, there will be time for reflection on what has caused this
tragedy. Here are some preliminary thoughts – that join my thoughts and
prayers for the victims - that may be worth reflecting on in the months
ahead:
Is it guns, or people, that kill? As the old saying goes,
Teddy Kennedy’s cars have killed more people than all the guns of 99%
of all gun owners in America. And this true around the world. My
brother lived in ultra-safe Switzerland for years. Why is Switzerland so
safe? Is it because guns are outlawed?
Hardly.
Wikipedia notes: “
If
you were a Swiss man, you would be a soldier as well. Every able-bodied
Swiss man must go to the army in Switzerland for 90 days
(Rekrutenschule-Ecole de recrue) and then every 2 years until the age of
42, he must return for practice for 19 days. This allows the government
to raise an army of 400,000 men, fully armed, within 24 hours, as every
soldier has an assault gun in his house, complete with ammunition. But
there is more to this than a picturesque democratic institution.” http://switzerland.isyours.com/e/swiss-business-guide/swiss-army.html
“; moreover, “Each individual is required to keep his army issued
personal weapon (the 5.56x45mm SIG 550 rifle for enlisted personnel or
the SIG 510 rifle and/or the 9mm SIG-Sauer P220 semi-automatic pistol
for officers, medical and postal personnel) at home with a specified
personal retention quantity of government issued personal ammunition (50
rounds 5.56/48 rounds 9mm…)http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/gun_politics_in_switzerland.” Meanwhile, in gun-control happy Chicago – which has banned guns for all practical purposes -
the city has become the leading “alpha” city for gun murders
in the world. For comparison, drug war ridden Mexico City 8.0 murders a year per 100,000, Moscow 9.6, Sao Paolo 15.6 and
Chicago 19.4. Similarly, Washington DC, which has banned concealed carry since 1975, has one of the highest rates of murder in the U.S.
Could
it be, as former gun control advocate turned gun rights supporter Dr.
John Lott of Univ. of Chicago maintains, in his eponymous book More
Guns, Less Crime, that we are
safer with more guns? Certainly, a
single trained concealed carry
theatre-goer in Colorado would have put an end to the rampage much
earlier, with significantly less loss of life. As Exhibit A: scarcely
one week before the Colorado tragedy, a similar situation had an
opposite ending in Florida, where 71 year old Samuel Williams stopped an
armed robbery when two masked men entered the Palms Internet Cafe
around 10 p.m. Friday, July 13, 2012. Make your own conclusion from the
the surveillance camera, which captures it all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZNC2VwyaPU&feature=player_embedded#t=0s.
Exhibit B: Scarcely a month after the Colorado theatre shooting, on the
opposite side of the country, an Orange County, CA. jewelry and coin
dealer thwarted and armed robbery – and possible employee deaths – by
defending herself with her pistol. Video surveillance footage at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjXJBpV9YRI
Dr. Lott documents many thousands of similar situations, but here is
one woman, in her own words, discussing after the fact how her gun saved
her life:
http://bcove.me/zgbghtxu. As a matter of fact, Gun Owners of America, at
http://gunowners.org/sk0802.htm, cites statistics indicating guns are used 2.5
million times a year in
self-defense, or around 80 times a day (other statistics estimate this number could range as low as 1.5 million, but either number is a
lot!).
This includes 200,000 women a year using guns to defend themselves
against sexual abuse. As a matter of fact, as of 2008, armed citizens
killed more violent bad guys than the police (1,527 vs. 606).
The unfortunate thing about the Colorado shooting is that, while Colorado has concealed carry laws,
the theatre where the shooting occurred was a gun free zone -
despite what Roger Ebert fallaciously stated in the New York Times (as a
matter of fact, Warner Houston at Breitbart.com wrote
in 2009
that an Alaskan member of a gun owner’s message board had wanted to
enter a Cinemark theatre, but was refused entry because it was gun free
zone).
So, what about other locales in Colorado where concealed carry is
allowed, and a shooter began a rampage? We
have exact, historical records: In Dec., 2007, five people were shot
(two killed) when gunman Matthew Murray, packing a semi-automatic rifle
and two pistols, attacked the New Life Church in Colorado Springs (he
had gone to another site previously, killing two, while wounding
others). This might have been a tragedy similar in scope to the recent
Batman movie shooting –
except that the gunman was shot by
church security office Jeanne Assam with here personally owned concealed
weapon. Similarly, on April 22
nd – scant months before this tragedy, and also
in Aurora, CO.
– a convicted felon shot and killed the mother of the Pastor, Delano
Stephan of New Destiny Christian Center as the service was ending. We
don’t know how far this could have escalated – as the shooter was shot
and killed by someone with a concealed gun. (See
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/04/22/2-shot-outside-aurora-church/
Incidentally,
Aurora, CO., where the tragic Holmes shooting occurred, has some of the
most strict gun laws in the state, including:
- “Dangerous weapons” including firearms prohibited.
- Revocation of license for furnishing a firearm to a minor or someone under the influence.
- Window displays cannot include firearms with barrels less than 12 inches long.
- Unlawful to carry concealed “dangerous weapon.”
- Unlawful to discharge firearms, unless by law enforcement on duty or on shooting range.
- Unlawful to possess firearm while under the influence of intoxicant.
- Unlawful to have loaded firearm in motor vehicle.
- Unlawful for a juvenile to possess a firearm.
Of course, all the explosives in Holmes’ apartment were “illegal,” too.
One
state to the west, Utah, saw a similar situation where on Feb. 12,
2007, Muslim Sulejman Talovic, who told his girlfriend the day before
his rampage that his martyrdom would be “the happiest day of his life,”
opened fire in the crowded Trolley Square mall, killing five.
Unfortunately for Sulejman, there was was an armed bystander, off-duty
Ogden policeman Ken Hammond. Officer Hammond pinned down Talovic – preventing futher deaths - until
a SWAT team arrived and provided the martyrdom Talovic wanted. Hammond
was credited with saving “countless lives” – something, unfortunately,
the gun free zone in Aurora, CO. did not experience.
It appears George Washington had it right, when he said “The
very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil
interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.”
Thomas Jefferson certainly felt the same way, saying "Laws
that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither
inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse
for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to
encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked
with greater confidence than an armed one."
What about concealed carry? Statistics from the recent past show states that passed concealed carry reduced
their murder rate by 8.5%, rapes by 5% and robbery by 3%. Florida,
which passed concealed carry in 1987, saw its higher than average
homicide rate drop 52% during the following 15 years after passage, to
below the national average. And no, concealed carry does not result in chaos, as the average Floridian is more likely to be attacked by an alligator than by a concealed carry holder.
As
a matter of fact, the US. Dept. of Justice, in its (admittedly dated)
publication, “The Armed Criminal in America: A Survey of Incarcerated
Felons, Research Report July, 1985,” stated that 60% of felons they
surveyed agreed that “a criminal is not going to mess around with a
victim he knows is armed with a gun”; 74% agreed with the statement “one
reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear
being shot during the crime”; and finally, 57% of felons agreed that
“criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are
about running into police.”
Meanwhile a
s gun sales climb to record highs - 47% of
American adults currently report that they have a gun in their home or
elsewhere on their property, and given that many gun owners have
multiple guns, there may be more guns now than Americans -
2010 FBI data shows violent crime continuing to fall (
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010 )
in the United States, with homicides dropping out of the top 15 causes
of death in the country. The statistics undermine a favorite argument of
anti-gun groups that “more guns equal more crime.” The reverse is
true. As Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF senior vice president and
general counsel. Noted, “These statistics vividly demonstrate that the
lawful possession and use of firearms by law-abiding Americans does not
cause crime…There have never been more firearms in civilian possession
in the history of the United States, and crime, including homicide,
continues to decline throughout the country.”
The
truth is, when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. The
truth is, that the Colorado shooter would still have found ways to get,
or make weapons, even if they had been made illegal (certainly, Timothy
McVeigh and the leftist Unibomber found a way!). The truth is if guns
kill people, then pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk, and spoons
made Oprah fat. The truth is that one never sees gun murders at gun
shows, where guns are seemingly every two steps one takes. And finally,
the truth is that, as Stephen Dubner wrote, “far more children die each
year in swimming pool accidents than in gun incidents.”
And the truth is practically illustrated in Kennesaw, GA – where gun ownership is mandatory for every head of household, per ordinance [Sec 34-21], which states: (a)
In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and
further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and
general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household
residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together
with ammunition therefore, and (b) Exempt from the effect of this
section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental
disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further
exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who
are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a
result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a
felony.”
Kennesaw – contrary to what the
gun grabbers would have you believe - is not the Wild West, but rather
was voted by Family Circle magazine as one of the nation’s “10 best
towns for families.” (
http://www.familycircle.com/family-fun/money/10-best-towns-for-families/?page=4)
The city website also claims Kennesaw ““has the lowest crime rate in
Cobb County” – this in one of the most populated counties in Georgia. In
fact, from 1982 through 2009, Kennesaw, with a population of just under
25,000, had only one murder, in 2007. Compare this to gun-free New York
City, which in a recent 25-year period had more than 15,000 murders –
2, 245 in 1990 alone (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NYC_murders.PNG) – while Kennesaw, Georgia, had 1. Yes, these are different cities – but
twenty five thousand to one?? I, for one, am not going to even bother with doing the math for this. The truth is that it is
the inter-generational socio-pathology that the left has created that has created this society of killers and psychopaths (see
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2936).
Moreover, if we are to ban guns, may I humbly suggest that we also ban hands and feet, as well as butterknives? As
http://personalliberty.com/2012/08/01/time-to-ban-hands-feet-and-the-fda/?eiid=
notes, in 2010 alone, 742 people were killed by hands or feet, with 540
people killed by blunt objects. (and let’s not forget the 82,724 people
who died as a result of FDA approved drugs). In contrast, only 0.1% of
all homicides involved five or more victims. Even the Brady Campaign to
Prevent Gun Violence admits that, since 2010, a grand total of 35 people
have been killed in 9 separate incidents in which an assault weapon was
involved (even if the gun was not the murder weapon). Perhaps, it the
gun grabbers really want to keep us safe, perhaps they could ban the
FDA? Similarly, within a month of the Colorado tragedy,
nine people were killed and others wounded in a
knife attack in China (see
http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-teen-kills-eight-knife-attack-reports-102629246.html)
On
a broader level, guns also have historically ensured American freedom.
Bill Bonner wrote “When King George sent troops to put down the
revolution a letter appeared in the London paper. It came from a man who
had lived in the colonies. He told his countrymen that if they were
shipping out to fight the Americans they should be sure to write their
Last Wills and Testaments before they left. Because the Americans all
had guns and knew how to use them.
And King George wasn’t alone: Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief, Imperial Japanese Navy, killed in action, April 1943, said “You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”
But what about other countries? I’m glad you asked!
For England, as the article Barbarians Within the Gates, Part III, Schwarz Report, Oct. 2011, p. 5 noted, “The UK’s ban on handguns in 1997 “did not stop actual crimes committed with handguns. Those crimes rose
nearly 40% according to a 2001 study by King’s College London’s Centre
for Defense Studies, and doubled by a decade later, according to
government statistics reported in the London Telegraph in October 2009.”
Just for good measure, England has a 10 year sentence for possession of
“any knife with a blade more than three inches long” (I literally have
no idea if this includes butterknives!). No word yet if England has
banned running with scissors or people using pencils with sharp points.
Across the English Channel, Holland’s draconian gun laws certainly haven’t helped – witness the recent report at
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-20052416.html , entitled
7 Killed 15 Wounded in Dutch Mall, while across the border Nazi guns laws against Jewish firearm owners 60 years ago, as Stephen Halbrook has written,
“played
a major role in laying the groundwork for the eradication of German
Jewry in the Holocaust. Disarming political opponents was a categorical
imperative of the Nazi regime” (a full rendering of Nazi gun control laws, including ones against the Jews, is found at
http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.html).
The experience with Hitler was anticipated by the Second Amendment,
which declares: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,
shall not be infringed.” This right reflects a universal and historical
power of the people in a republic to resist tyranny,
was not recognized in the German Reich – and led to disaster.
In
Australia after they banned guns recently, armed robberies were up 69%;
assaults with guns up 28%, gun murders up 19% and home invasions up 21%
(except the Australian government still refuses to define what a “home
invasion” is (no word if they have defined what the meaning of “is” is,
either).
Full details at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=p8RDWltHxRc
Closer
to home, as a dual US/Canadian citizen, who has spent half my life in
both countries, Canada has some of the strictest gun control legislation
in the world. From having a very close friend having a neighbor
murdered right outside her front door, to my brother in law telling me
about a knife murder at a mall down the street, to the week we moved
from Canada, when someone with an illegal gun committed murder
on Elgin St. in Ottawa, the whole gun grabber thing is a disaster in
Canada. The results of strict Canadian gun control laws?
On Jan. 13, 2011 the
Ottawa Citizen, even acknowledged that Canadian gun legislation is an abject failure:
“As
strict as Canadian gun laws appear, they do not prevent the movement of
illegal firearms in or out of this country, nor their possession, and
only cover those firearms that have been registered. Last year, Canadian
police services reported some 8,000 victims of violent gun crime,
ranging from assault to robbery and homicide — a rate of almost one
person per hour victimized by violent gun crime. On average, more than
1,200 Canadians are killed and more than 1,000 injured with firearms
each year.”
And if you thought the Giffords
shooting in Arizona was bad (and it was!) in 2006 a Canadian gunman
uploaded pictures of himself posing with a rifle. He bragged on his blog
that he loved the Internet game based on the Columbine shootings. One
day he decided to stop playing. He went to a Montreal college and, when
all was said and done, he killed one person and seriously wounded
another 19 before he shot himself. Less than 10 days after the Colorado
theatre shootings, Toronto had a shooting that killed two and wounded 21
(
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/17/one-dead-several-injured-in-scarborough-shooting);
in turn, this had been preceded a month earlier by a Toronto mall
shooting at the Eaton Centre, which killed one and injured seven (
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/02/world/americas/canada-mall-shooting/index.html). The stories in Canada go on, but I won’t
Canada’s
stringent gun laws, in the form of Bill C-68, apply to handguns and
rifles. This has been universally acknowledged as an abject failure,
including over $1 billion dollars lost on something that didn’t work.
Here’s the details for those of you that aren’t aware:
There
are nearly 7 million registered long guns in Canada. Since 2003, when
mandatory long gun registration was introduced, of the 2,441 homicides
in Canada, less than 2% (47 to be exact) have been committed by those
registered guns (figures cited from Canadian Centre of Justice
Statistics). According to Statistics Canada, in 2008 there were around
23,500 victims of violent crime committed with a knife, with homicides
and attempted murders about 1/3rd of such incidents (cited from Lawyers
Weekly, 21 May, 2010). No word yet whether leftists will introduce a
“long butterknife” bill - you know, you can never be too careful about
those doggoned table settings, including possible strangulation by
napkins!!
Let me conclude with an anecdotal story to help reify
the matter. Canadian John Myers writes about a personal experience in
Alberta (and which is borne out by Dr. John Lott’s aforementioned book,
“More Guns, Less Crime”: at
http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/civil-liberty/with-gun-control-canadian-criminals-are-making-a-killing/?eiid=&rmid=2011_01_26_PLA_[PIZ0411C]&rrid=238494331. Myers writes:
“I
never imagined that a time would come where I would have to level my
shotgun at a person; that I would take deadly aim with it. But that
happened when I as a senior at the University of Calgary and was
cramming for a final. Around midnight I heard a car screech to a stop
outside my parent’s home which sat on an isolated street. I was home
alone with the family dog, Elsa, a Great Dane with a gentle disposition.
In
the news had been reports that two men were terrorizing women on
Calgary streets. Two young women, Laurie Boyd and Debbie Stevens, had
been dragged from their cars at night and murdered. I heard pounding at
the front door. I knew something was seriously wrong when I opened the
door to find my girlfriend Angela standing before me crying. Before I
could even ask her what was happening a second car pulled into our
driveway with the high-beams on.
I took Angela inside and went
outside to see what the commotion was about. I brought the family dog
with me and kept her leash wrapped tightly around my hand. Two men were
walking straight towards the door; neither one saying a word and neither
showing any regard for me or our dog which was growling and barking.
I
dragged the dog back inside and gave her to Angela. I remembered the
Remington that I kept in the front closet. I found it and then fumbled
for the single target load shell that I kept in the corner of the hat
shelf. It was all the ammunition I had, but I was damn happy to have it.
I
was shaking, but I loaded the shell. I slipped back outside. I was
surprised at how close these strangers were to me; perhaps fewer than 20
paces. I remember the taller of the two had his hand reached inside his
coat.
It was dark so at first I don’t think they noticed my
shotgun. But they knew it was there when I raised it to my shoulder and
pumped the fore-end, chambering the shell. In a split second they spun
and ran to their car, roaring off into the darkness.
More than a
year later two men, Jim Peters and Rob Brown, were charged and convicted
on multiple charges of murder. My girlfriend Angela later became my
wife. To this day we don’t know if those men were the Calgary serial
killers. All these years later we remain certain of two things: These
men had evil intentions and we were damned lucky to have that shotgun.”
There’s
more to gun ownership in America than meets the eye. Don’t let the
leftists take the moral high ground on this one - that belongs one
hundred percent to the gun owners.
J. Vanne
Posts
