Hey ferfal,
I’m sure you have probably got this email before, but
just in case you haven’t:
I have seen posts questioning the SA XD, and I can say
with certainty they’re good stuff.
A friend of mine has a Glock 9mm (G 17 I believe, but
I cant say I remember well), and I have an SA XD 9 subcompact.
Fired side by side the action is very similar.
The action on the SA is (get this) smoother, but
recoils wasn’t noticeably different. The Glock felt a little more mechanical.
You can feel the slide run back, and impact the stop during ejection of the
round.
I’ve played with them a bit and the only thing I can
think of is the polymer frame on the XD absorbs vibration so you feel less vibration
in your hand when firing.
This will most likely mean that the steel frame of the
Glock might hold up to abuse more, but I have seen good things during my
reliability research. The polymer frame will also resist corrosion more when
exposed to oils and acids of concealment.
When looking for a common failure on the XD forums the
most common issue I can find is “too many dry fires causes a pin to snap”; this
pin however prevents the firing pin from smacking the breach wall and a failed
pin will prevent a fractured breach wall.
I cleaned it once, and then ran 100 FMJs through it,
then 100 HPs through it without a clean or oil, and it didn’t jam. It doesn’t
have a manual safety, but it has a grip safety and a trigger safety. The grip
safety prevents the slide from cycling, and the trigger safety puts a physical
block in the path of the firing pin so allegedly, if the pin of a cocked gun
dislodges and engages it will not make it all the way to the round without
hitting the block first.
I haven’t been able to confirm this one: I loaded my
XD up with snap caps (dummy rounds that don’t fire) cocked it, and threw it
around a room for 5 minutes and I wasn’t able to get the firing pin to dislodge
and drop-fire.
I was able to stovepipe it. Here’s how; chamber round,
remove clip, fire.
There is a button that the round follower in the clip
engages to lock the slide back on the final round that wasn’t present.
In a normal situation, the following round will aid in
ejection of the previous round (pushing it out) on the last round of each clip,
there is no following round so when the slide locks back it allows a few extra
milliseconds for the last round to eject.
The subcompact 9 doesn’t have much recoil for a short
barrel and it conceals well for its size.
The handle is wide like a Glock’s handle so it fits
comfortably in the hand of a decent size guy(I am 6’6” with a size 13-USA
shoe). I tried the Rueger lc9 which is very similar to the bodyguard and it
actually hurts to fire because the small square handle wiggles in my hand under
recoil and causes pressure points. The recoils of the smaller 38cal LC9 is
higher than the recoil of my XD 9mm subcompact also. There is an accessory rail
on the XD 9 standard, and subcompact. Fitting a light to the rail (very close
to the exit of the barrel) will certainly cover the lens in burnt cordite after
100 rounds, but if your firing 100 rounds in a situation of duress you have bigger problems than a
dirty light.
In a pancake holster on the small of the back there is
a bit of discomfort sitting down leaning back on something, so I can’t say it
will be a perfect conceal carry weapon. It is comfortable to stand with, and
doesn’t show under a shirt in the small of the back though. So if you have a
standup job, go for it.
Hope this helps answer the XD question.
-Jim
Thanks for your email Jim. Indeed, I get asked about the
XD a lot and here is my opinion.
Before saying anything, I have to say that I just love
guns. Heck, I love anything that shoots, cuts, explodes or has any kind of violent
chemical reaction. Just the way it is. But when it comes down to giving advice
I can only call it as I see it and I see the Glock being the best, most
successful all around combat handgun. I’m not saying that the XD is a bad gun,
its very good, but a Glock it is not. Not only is the XD a copy (some will say
improved version of..) of what was already done correctly the first time (in
the Glock), with a few changes here and there so as to at least do something
different, the changes made aren’t the ones I would have done myself.
Take the XD grip safety for example. Why? Dear God,
why?
Even JMB didn’t like the grip safety in the 1911. He
included it because it was demanded by the military. He got rid of it in the
Hi-Power. The grip safety also means that the gun will not fire if not gripped
properly and that is NOT a good thing. Yes, in ideal conditions you always grip
the gun as you´re supposed to, but there’s nothing ideal about a gunfight.
Chances of you getting shot in your arms during a gunfight and getting a finger
blown off? Chances of that are actually pretty high (within the context of
being in a gunfight). It generally tends to work this way: When you shoot at someone
and he has a gun, he probably will shoot back. You naturally will shoot center
of mass, and both of you will have your hands and arms covering your center of
mass because that’s just what happens with nearly all shooting stances, even
point aiming, even instinctive shooting. Stand in front of someone aiming at
you and you see it clearly. This is why learning to shoot and reload with your
other hand is important and is trained often.
Maybe because of the stress you just got a less than perfect grip, it
can happen too. The gun should still fire in spite of a poor grip being used.
Why a safety in the first place? Manual safeties where
used mostly because of the mechanical unreliability of the first autos, then
their use continued because of police or military spec requirements. Still, if you think about it you can see how unnecessary
they are with safer modern guns. Have you ever seen a manual safety in a
revolver? You don’t need one either in a modern striker fire auto.
Finally, no other handgun is as prolific in the
defensive and tactical community. If there’s parts and accessories available for
a gun, anywhere in the world, that sure is Glock.
FerFAL
