This is the first submission of a multi-part
essay by Jim V on Gun Control. It’s well researched and packed with
information. Looking forward to the following chapters by Jim!
FerFAL
FerFAL
“Quemadmoeum gladuis neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.” (A sword is never a killer, it is a tool in the killer’s hands.)
– Lucius Annaeus Seneca, circa 4 BC – 65 AD
– Lucius Annaeus Seneca, circa 4 BC – 65 AD
“Americans
[have] the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the citizens of
other countries whose governments are afraid to trust their people with
arms”
– James Madison, considered the father of the US Constitution
“[T]he people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”– James Madison, considered the father of the US Constitution
- Zacharia Johnson, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, 1788
“During World War II, six million Swiss had guns and six million Jews did not.”
– Author unknown
– Author unknown
“…sort
of like the people who repeat foolish slogans like “guns kill” – as
though guns sprout little feet when no one is looking and run around
shooting people all by themselves.”
– Doug Casey, financial columnist
– Doug Casey, financial columnist
“If
you don’t have to give up your car because others drive drunk with
theirs, then why do you have to give up your gun because others commit
crimes with theirs?”
– Anonymous internet wag
– Anonymous internet wag
“When a crime is committed, does the gun go to jail?”
- From BrotherJohn.com
- From BrotherJohn.com
“Let’s
stop playing games. The problem is people, not guns. Our society
suffers from a deficiency of personal responsibility – not from an
excess of personal freedom.”
– Star Parker, African American writer and commentator
“The
horrifying truth is this: we live now in a culture that not only does
not respect life, but discards it like trash — not only at the beginning
of life, but also at the end, and every place in between. What has
happened to us?”– Star Parker, African American writer and commentator
– Catholic Deacon Greg Kandra
“…we’re
also going to make it clear that when a pig gets iced that’s a good
thing, and that everyone who considers himself a revolutionary should be
armed, should own a gun, should have a gun in his house.”
– Bill Ayers, leftist activist and confidant of gun control happy Barack Obama, in A Strategy To Win, appearing in New Left Notes, September 12, 1969
– Bill Ayers, leftist activist and confidant of gun control happy Barack Obama, in A Strategy To Win, appearing in New Left Notes, September 12, 1969
“‘The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.'”
| - HL Mencken
| - HL Mencken
“No
free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason
for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last
resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”
– Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
– Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
INTRODUCTION
The
utterly horrific Colorado and Connecticut shootings, among others, are
still being processed into the collective conscience of America.
Clearly, everyone of good conscience will grieve for the lives that were
lost and damaged. But it is time now to reflect on what has caused
tragedies such as these, and others. Here are some preliminary thoughts
that may be worth reflecting on as you consider the gun control issue,
that is sure to surface again in the near future:
First, is
it guns, or is it people, that kill? As the old saying goes, Teddy
Kennedy’s cars have killed more people than all the guns of 99.999% of
all gun owners in America. And this true around the world. My brother
lived in ultra-safe Switzerland for years. Why is Switzerland so safe?
Is it because guns are outlawed?
Hardly.
Wikipedia notes: “If
you were a Swiss man, you would be a soldier as well. Every able-bodied
Swiss man must go to the army in Switzerland for 90 days
(Rekrutenschule-Ecole de recrue) and then every 2 years until the age of
42, he must return for practice for 19 days. This allows the government
to raise an army of 400,000 men, fully armed, within 24 hours, as every
soldier has an assault gun in his house, complete with ammunition.” http://switzerland.isyours.com/e/swiss-business-guide/swiss-army.html
“; moreover, “Each individual is required to keep his army issued
personal weapon (the 5.56x45mm SIG 550 rifle for enlisted personnel or
the SIG 510 rifle and/or the 9mm SIG-Sauer P220 semi-automatic pistol
for officers, medical and postal personnel) at home with a specified
personal retention quantity of government issued personal ammunition (50
rounds 5.56/48 rounds 9mm…)
http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/gun_politics_in_switzerland.” Switzerland which has had three times the gun ownership as, for example Germany, has also had a much lower murder rate. And statistics like this ring true throughout the world. A short 3 minute video is here, for those that wish to see a short report on the Swiss and their guns http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WFUu7cfa7k&feature=player_embedded#t=22s
http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/gun_politics_in_switzerland.” Switzerland which has had three times the gun ownership as, for example Germany, has also had a much lower murder rate. And statistics like this ring true throughout the world. A short 3 minute video is here, for those that wish to see a short report on the Swiss and their guns http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WFUu7cfa7k&feature=player_embedded#t=22s
Indeed,
Thomas Sowell notes countries with stronger gun control laws than the
US, such as Russia, Brazil and Mexico (Mexico basically bans firearms
completely, yet has a higher gun homicide rate than the US), have
much higher murder rates, while there are many countries with high
rates of gun ownership but low murder rates, such as Israel, New Zealand
and Finland. In fact, in Mexico, the murder rate is 22.7 murders per
100,000, whereas the global average is ~7 homicides per 100,000, and the
gun happy US is 4.8 murders per 100,000. http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-to-end-gun-debate-forever.html. That is correct – the US, which has the widest gun ownership in the world, is below the worldwide average in homicides. Of course, in the US, approximately 90 million legal owners of guns, owing 300 million firearms; murdered zero
people last year. Contrast that with the approximately 170 million
Prof. R.J. Rummel of Univ. of Hawaii, in his book Death by Government,
says were killed in the last century, the majority of them after their
governments disarmed them (Stéphane Courtois, author of the highly regarded Black Book of Communism estimates 94 million were murdered by Communists alone).
An hour long, very sobering summary video documenting what happens when
the population has their weapons removed can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDivHkQ2GSg&feature=player_embedded#t=8s
Or perhaps one might wish to contrast this to the 32,000 people who
lost their lives – including thousands of youth – in car accidents last
year (see http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1103.pdf or http://www.nhtsa.gov/NCSA
to get the latest exact figure). And for those of you who correctly
answered the “cars are necessary, but guns are not” objection, a gold
star, for indeed you are correct – an armed population, as the Founding
Fathers repeatedly noted, is the sine qua non of a free country
and a free population. “Free” as in – as historical records show –
comparison to a country like the USSR, Cuba or China that end up
murdering millions – including children (just google “Ukrainian Kulak” and look at the photos of millions of children who were murdered by Stalin’s government. As the saying goes, “Free men have guns; slaves do not.”
An interview in The State Journal of West Virginia, regarding guns and the 2nd
Amendment, is illustrative of the rabid anti-gun attitudes of the
politically correct cadre. Predictably, the media talking head, who is
of course anti-gun, interviews Keith Morgan, president of the West
Virginia Citizen’s Defense League. The reporter tried to push the old
canard that a national debate on guns is long overdue. (Yes… apparently
leftist media reporters all get their same talking points from the same,
lame “LeftistTalking Point Depot!”), to which Morgan replies “I have
to take issue with the immediate premise that we started out with that
it’s a long overdue discussion. The discussion is as old as the country
itself. The Framers set everything up and settled that discussion
pretty well with the wording and language of the Second Amendment…”
Mr. Morgan has it 100% nailed on the head!
HOW EFFECTIVE IS GUN CONTROL?
A
2000 study by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms revealed that
47% of guns used for crime are obtained via a straw purchase, while
another 26% are stolen. So, how effective is firearms control in
practice? In gun-control happy Chicago – which has banned guns for all
practical purposes – the city has become the leading “alpha” city for
gun murders in the world. 2012 ended with around five hundred murders in the city. http://news.yahoo.com/chicago-reaches-500-homicides-fatal-shooting-145951769.html – sixty of which were children! In fact, “gun free” Chicago had more murders than the entire nation of Japan in 2012. For comparison, drug war ridden Mexico City has 8.0 murders a year per 100,000 population, Moscow 9.6, Sao Paolo 15.6 and Chicago 19.4. Similarly,
Washington DC, which has banned concealed carry since 1975, has one of
the highest rates of murder in the U.S. And of course, one might also
have the temerity to ask why there are no theatre, mall or school
shootings in Israel, where a goodly percentage of the population is
armed, including fully automatic weapons. (Picture from http://janmorganmedia.com/2012/12/why-you-dont-hear-about-any-school-shootings-in-israel/ )
Let’s
examine Chicago and a similar size city, Houston, which has concealed
carry. Details are from 2012 – and do note that Chicago just recently
was forced to adopt more lenient gun laws in the past year – during which time the homicide rate dropped. Those facts are not indicated in the chart below. How did formerly gun control happy Chicago and Houston compare?
Chicago , IL
|
Houston , TX
| |
Population
|
2.7 million
|
2.15 million
|
Median HH income
|
$38,600
|
$37,000
|
% African-American
|
32.9%
|
24%
|
% Hispanic
|
28.9%
|
44%
|
% Asian
|
5.5%
|
6%
|
% non-Hispanic White
|
31.7%
|
26%
|
A reasonably similar matchup -until:
Chicago, IL
|
Houston, TX
| |
Concealed carry gun law
|
No
|
Yes
|
# of gun stores
|
0
| 84 dedicated gun shops, 1500 places to buy guns (Walmart, etc.) |
Homicides, 2012
|
506
|
207
|
Homicides per 100k
|
18.4
|
9.6
|
Average January
high temp, F |
31
|
63
|
Presumably the leftist conclusion from the above is that cold weather causes shootings!
OK, so what about New York City? Yes, there was a reduction in gun shootings in 2012, but there were still 414 homicides in 2012.
Notwithstanding the fact that NYC is almost becoming a police state, a
one year drop could be attributable to many things, and as Frank
Zimring, professor of law at UC Berkeley told NPR, “”If you’re gonna
make the assumption that changes in crime rates always are responding to
policies then why shouldn’t we be blaming the police for the slight
increases [in New York's murder rate] in 2010 and 2011?” No word from
Mr. Bloomberg on that… nor why Mr. Bloomberg has changed his tune from
“al Qaeda hates us for our freedoms” to the situation today, where the
NYPD conducts unconstitutional stop-and-frisk searches all over NYC.
And the reality is that the general trend in NYC has been a general
trend of a drop in murder rates in NYC since the 1990s.
As
a matter of fact, Dr. John Lott spoke on the Piers Morgan show shortly
after the Connecticut school shooting, and noted that since 1950, in
almost every public mass shooting in which three or more people
died, it was in a setting where guns are banned, such as schools. Of
course, relative to the Sandy Hook tragedy, Connecticut already had
banned “assault weapons,” and the Newtown school was already a gun free
zone. There also is already a total ban on guns in the possession of
mentally unstable in Connecticut. A lot of good that did. And if the
shooter didn’t get it from his mother in this case, do you really think
he wouldn’t have gone to the black market to get one, or turned to other
tools, such as the bombs the leftist Unibomber or Timothy McVeigh
used? Were people any less dead because those two men used bombs
instead of guns? On a personal level, when I was a student teacher in
Illinois, a young high school student set a bomb right outside my
classroom – it was found before it went off, but could have killed many
students if it hadn’t been found in time. Are we next going to ban intelligence so that people can’t make bombs out of various materials? As a matter of fact, perhaps we already have
banned intelligence – or at least wisdom – from our schools. But that
is a story for another day…. along with some enterprising researcher
conducting a study correlating the number of school shootings with the
number of teachers having sex with their students.
Meanwhile,
hidden from public view by a leftist media, school shootings are indeed
occurring in countries with strict gun control. Former psychology
professor and Army Ranger Lt. Col. David Grossman noted in Dec., 2012,
on his Facebook site atwww.facebook.com/LtColDaveGrossman,
that gun control poster child Germany has had two mass murders in their
high schools that had body counts surpassing those at Columbine, while
Dunblain, Scotland had a massacre in a kindergarten class, and just down
the road from where I used to live in Alberta, Canada, the town of
Taber experienced a school massacre. Handguns are outlawed in Canada.
Finland has had three school massacres, and of course there was the
Anders Breivik massacre in Norway, which also has restrictions on gun
ownership. And if it isn’t guns, it’s knives. Grossman notes in gunless
Belgium, a sicko dressed as the Joker from Batman got into a day care
centre and hacked a dozen babies in their cribs, injuring them. Two more
babies were killed, as well as one daycare worker. If leftists want
schools and other areas as “gun free zones,” perhaps we should make
those who created gun free zones liable for the murders that occur
there? And at the same time, may we ask why government
buildings in Washington DC are “gun free zones” – or is it that the
“let them eat cake” ruling class gets armed security everywhere they go
in the town (not to mention exemption from ObamaCare), while the rest
of us poor, unwashed masses have to trust our safety to luck? In fact,
there is a formal petition to the White House to have the Secret Service
protecting the president and others in Washington made a gun free zone –
remember, it is guns themselves that are the cause of crime. (Article
at http://www.examiner.com/article/white-house-petition-demands-secret-service-be-replaced-by-gun-free-zone?cid=Editorial-NearYou-HP-RecentArticles
But,
in case you don’t believe Lt. Colonel Grossman or Dr. Lott, perhaps you
might believe the man running lead for Obama’s gun control task force
after Sandy Hook, Joe Biden? Here is Biden in his own words, explaining
that gun control will not stop a potential mass shooting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTyoppK_aDM&feature=player_embedded#t=2s
The top ten school massacres are listed here, for your reference: http://listverse.com/2008/01/01/top-10-worst-school-massacres/,
the worst being the Beslan school massacre in Russia, with 386 dead,
and over 700 injured by Chechen militants. In the US, one of the first
US school massacres occurred, as Mark Steyn notes, on July
25,1764, when “…four Lenape Indians walked into a one-room schoolhouse
in colonial Pennsylvania and killed Enoch Brown and ten of his pupils.
One child survived, scalped and demented to the end of his days” (no
assault rifles were recorded as being used in this attack); and the
worst massacre in a US schooloccurred May 18.
1927, in Bath, Michigan, when school board treasurer Andrew Kehoe used a
bomb to blow up the Bath Consolidated School, killing 44 people,
including 38 children. Again, much to the chagrin of the left, no
assault weapon was used.
And the comments from the left that masquerade as “fact,” such as the post-Sandy Hook Bill Clinton statement: “Half
of all mass killings in the United States have occurred since the
assault weapons ban expired in 2005. Half of all of them in the history
of the country.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=or-inV1KKDE#t=0s are
not even close to reality. Leaving aside the definition of what “is”
is, what are the actual facts? Unfortunately – similar to the
ClimateGate revelations – someone actually did the research in a 2007
book entitled Mass Murder in the United States” A History,
authored by Grant Duwe, director of research and evaluation at the
Minnesota Dept. of Corrections. Here’s what Duwe found, as summarized
from http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/01/bill-clinton-caught-in-lie-over-mass-shootings-fact/ :
In
the past 100 years, there have been 156 mass killings where at least
four people were killed publicly with a firearm in under 24 hours, where
the killings did not include robbery, drugs or gangs. As of Jan., 2013,
there have been 32 mass public shootings since Clinton’s assault
weapons ban expired on Sept. 13, 2004, with seven in 2012. Here is the
tally by decade:
1900s : zero
1910s: 2
1920s: 2
1930s: 942
1940s: 8
1950s: 1
1960s: 6
1970s: 13
1980s: 32
1990s: 42
2000s: 28
2010s (three years): 14
1910s: 2
1920s: 2
1930s: 942
1940s: 8
1950s: 1
1960s: 6
1970s: 13
1980s: 32
1990s: 42
2000s: 28
2010s (three years): 14
Data
from Boston.com, using data extracted from official police reports to
the FBI, shows mass shootings in the US over the past 30 years have not increased. (See http://boston.com/community/blogs/crime_punishment/2012/08/no_increase_in_mass_shootings.html or as below)
Of course, the vast majority of these were not committed with semi-automatic rifles; rather, they were committed by handguns.
Why no outcry re. handguns? Is it because they look less “scary?” Or
might it really be because rifles could be used by a free people to
defend themselves against totalitarianism? Perhaps the left should lift
all restrictions on long guns, and legislate against handguns if they
honestly wanted to make a dent in the death toll. (And while they are at
it, perhaps they could pass legislation against “Fast & Furious”
Eric Holder being anywhere within 100 miles of any gun at all.)
On the other side of the school shooter equation, in
2008, the isolated Harrold Independent School District in Texas, noting
the damage done in the Columbine shootings, among others, decided the
20 minutes it could take police to arrive could lead to a horrific
disaster, trained school staff were allowed to carry firearms in
school. The result? Dead students? Mayhem? Actually… nothing, except a
safe school. School district superintendent David Thweatt simply stated
“We’re the first responders. We have to be. We don’t have 5 minutes. We
don’t have 10 minutes. We would have had 20 minutes of hell” if the
school was attacked. In fact, Evan Todd – who was shot and wounded at
the Columbine massacre – makes this exact point (and a few more!) in his
open letter to President Obama of Feb., 2013, found at http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23858-have-you-read-evan-todd-s-letter-to-obama-yet . Todd elucidated on his points in a further interview found at http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/19/being-shot-gave-this-columbine-survivor-strong-views-on-gun-control-heres-why-he-opposes-more-restrictions/But lurking behind the school shooting question is the issue of “never let a crisis go to waste,” per Rahm Emmanuel. Is it really guns, or is it rather the gun grabber agenda that is in the dock here? If the former, why no comment from the leftist media that every month after the Sandy Hook shooting, on average 40 juveniles will be murdered with something other than a rifle? Or doesn’t that meet with the agenda du jour? (And I’m just waiting to hear some leftist claim that rifles cause global warming!)
And finally, if gun grabbers are so “concerned for the kids,” why then this story that came out just after Sandy Hook:
“Amid
all the hubbub surrounding Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s “assault weapons”
ban, there are still everyday stories of average law-abiding citizens
using firearms to defend themselves and others from evil — or in this
case, serious harm. An 11-year-old boy was riding his bike in a
Washington, DC, neighborhood when he came upon three pit bulls. The dogs
pounced, mauling the boy. Fortunately, a neighbor saw what was
happening, grabbed his handgun and rushed out to shoot one of the pit
bulls. A DC police officer patrolling nearby on a bicycle heard the
shot, and came to the boy’s aid as well, shooting the other two pit
bulls. The boy’s injuries were severe, but he will survive, thanks to
the quick action of this neighbor. However, the hero is under
investigation for violating local gun laws — discharging his weapon
while not on his own property. No word yet on whether charges will be
filed, but DC’s gun laws are what put children at risk.” (Source for this story not retained, but published week of 21 Jan., 2013)
This story clearly illustrates that for many on the left, it is not about the kids. It is about their agenda.
There is more to come, but this should get you started on your reflections on the issue.
2 comments:
"Handguns are outlawed in Canada".
No they are not, they are classified as "restricted" and are therefore legal, albeit much more difficult to acquire.
Check your facts please.
Handguns aren't outlawed in Canada. I personally own one. Granted we don't have concealed carry but they aren't outlawed and ANY law abiding Canadian citizen can take a course, get their restricted weapons permit and purchase a handgun.
As for the Taber "Massacre"... 1 student was shot and killed, and 1 was seriously wounded. That hardly constitutes a massacre by any stretch of the imagination.
I agree with the author on firearm ownership and gun control but publishing misleading or incorrect information to push an agenda is BS regardless of what side of the argument one takes.
Post a Comment