Monday, April 25, 2011

IMF, George Soros, the New World (Order) and why should you care.

1977 film Star Wars was on theaters before I was born, but I still remember some of the feelings when watching it for the first time in my life, several years later. I was a kid of course, about five or six, don’t remember, but I do remember Darth Sidious. Darth Vader had more screen time, a more visible character. To me he was evil but not as scary. He looked like a robot, cold and heartless, but a puppet in the end. On the other hand, the physical representation of evil was perfectly represented by Darth Sidious. He’s creepy, old and wise. He’s not heartless like the more robotic Darth Vader but his heart is black, full of hatred, a miserable old man, with extreme power so as to fulfill his desires of misery and suffering over billions of people across the known galaxy. Yes, Darth Sidious was the real villain, the evil old politician that smiles all the time, and its only because of George Lucas innocence during his younger years that Lord Sidious was a politician. Had Lucas written that script 20 years later he would have made him a banker. Why become a politician when you can just buy a handful?
Sorry for the off topic Star Wars pondering, let´s go back to this article’s issue.

Before Argentina collapsed financially in 2002 the IMF along with the help of corrupt local politicians including the ex-president Carlos Menem and former minister of economic( from Harvard), Domingo Cavallo, buried the country in public debt and then forced the selling of national assets including oil, airlines and other state owned companies. After the country was left in ruins a man named George Soros moved in and bought huge amounts of land and producing capital, becoming the largest holder of land for beef production, as well as soy bean plantation and the largest owner of processed daily production companies. George Soros was no stranger to Argentina and other emerging markets like Brazil, but his financial movements have always been… lets just call them, extremely well timed. Soros owned lots of real estate in Argentina during the 90’s some of the most significant buildings and shopping malls. He sold them right before the economic collapse and then moved back to buy land and property after the devaluation. Since he already knew where the country was going he also speculated with Argentine debt when it collapsed. Soros owns massive amounts of lands in Uruguay and Argentina as well. His objective? “Our mission is to become leading food and agricultural company in the planet”
Keep in mind Soros is called “The man than broke the Bank of England” he made 1 billion dollars short selling UK pounds on what was later called “Black Wednesday”, forcing UK to devaluate.
Maybe this all seems like far away and little consequence to you. Probably sitting in front of the computer now, over in USA several thousand miles away. Well, then you probably should check this video.

In April 2005, after Bush's re-election, Soros got together in a secretive meeting (called “the Phoneix Group” ) with about 70 other like-minded elite rich left leaning Democrats. The purpose of this meeting was to see what they would do about the US political situation in the next 5 years. Soros had donated $23,581,000 to various “527” groups dedicated to defeating President Bush.( A 527 group is a type of American tax-exempt organization named after a section of the United States tax code, 26 U.S.C. § 527. This party within the Democratic party became known as the “Shadow Party”, these guys, billionaires in the financial and tech sector, support politicians of their choosing through direct donations (as large as legally possible) and through their foundations and non profit orgnaizations, such as moveon dot org. The rabbit hole goes on with implications on how to handle the media so as to change people’s opinion, get reporters, journalists and why not celebrities in their pockets.

When the anti-Bush campaign failed, Soros again secretively gathered with other like minded elite so as to decide what to do next. A young charismatic Obama was chosen as the focus of their new efforts. Not only with the largest possible legal donation but using other channels as well, including what may have been millions of $25 private donations. When you hear for example that 90% of the donations to the Clinton Foundation comes from $250 donors, these are the things you don’t see due to its lack of transparency.
People think its Bob and Jane selling pies to send 250 bucks to Hillary because they just like her, when in reality its 10.000 x250 donations by the same person, or 31 millions from a uranium mining company owner in Kazakhstan.
But what about the IMF? And the World Bank? What’s that got to do with all this?
Its all the same old buddies, scratching each other´s back, supporting one another’s foundations or charities or whatever legal structure they are using.

IMF bank lords & George Soros’ INET at Bretton Woods, what’s the diff?

By Arlen Williams

World Bank Flag

KAOS from "Get Smart" more innocent and less creepy.

If USA ever ends up like Argentina, it will be because its orchestrated that way, because that’s exactly what these men want. And they are saying so as clearly as possible.

Prepare as well as you can. Without panicking, without going nuts and hiding under your bed or running for the hills, but fully understanding that things have already changed and will keep changing, sometimes not for good.
Take care folks,
Join the forum discussion on this post


Disciple of Night said...

IMF: America's Age Is Ending

Anonymous said...

Sorry FerFal, but this part makes no sense:

"In April 2005, Soros got together in a secretive meeting (called “the Phoneix Group” ) with about 70 other like-minded elite rich left leaning Democrats. The purpose of this meeting was to see what they would do about the US political situation in the next 5 years. Soros donated $23,581,000 to various “527” groups dedicated to defeating President Bush....When the anti-Bush campaign failed..."

President Bush was re-elected in 2004 and was legally barred from running for President again because of the two term limit. Nobody was making plans to "defeat" him personally because he was a lame duck and no longer a political threat at that point.

Unless by "defeat Bush" you mean "defeat Bush's allies and the Republican party". And even THAT doesn't make sense in this context, because there was no major election in 2005. The Democrats took majority in Congress in 2006 and gave the Republicans an asskicking that year. The anti-Bush administration campaign most definitely did NOT fail.

I don't doubt that elite manipulate and control the government. Nor do I doubt that Obama was chosen years in advance to be the next President. But that particular paragraph just doesn't fit with the rest of the post.

FerFAL said...

Youre right. Soros started the anti bush campagin in 2003, before his re-election. My mystake.

keith said...

what should be done to prepare if one is on a super tight budget?

Anonymous said...

Well good news is China has good ties with Russia who have good ties with many south american nations. But needless to say drastic changes will be coming to that region in the next 50 years as U.S power wanes. The injured and cornered animal is the fiercest.

K said...

Keith, "a super tight budget" is overly broad. If no other parameters are considered then planning would be a waste of time.

pheikki said...

FerFal, I understand your points about corporate control of politics and entire nations (including the USA of course). However, the left-right dichotomy is just political theater and a distraction. Totalitarianism can and does occur at either end of that spectrum. As Frank Zappa once said, politics is the entertainment arm of industry. The real divide is between the haves and the have-nots. Phil

Anonymous said...

The very things needed to survive a national collapse disaster - food, transportation, energy/fuel, private property, defenses etc - are going to be sooooooo tightly controlled if not banned outright before the collapse is allowed to happen.

Don Williams said...

1) In my opinion, the rich men who sold Argentina down the river were Argentina's own right wing billionaires. They controlled the government and could easily have kept people like Soros out.

2) They did not, in my opinion, because they feared their wealth would be confiscated by a populist movement reacting to the 2001 collapse.

So they sold their wealth, including land, to foreign companies in order to have wealth that is liquid and easily moved out of Argentina in case the billionaires decide to flee.

I won't name names unless people ask but I'm sure Ferfal knows at least several on the list. Including the publisher of Buenos Aires major newspaper.

3) Same thing is starting to happen in the USA, in my opinion. There is a long line of wealthy Americans at the UK Embassy in London queued up to renounce their US citizenship -- and their share of that $14.3 Trillion federal debt. Guess who is going to be left holding the bag of used kitty litter? heh heh heh.

Don Williams said...

1) Re wealthy Americans renouncing their US citizenship see

2) The US Congress passed a law in 2008 --hilariously named the HEART Act-- which imposes a tax on the net worth of a citizen renouncing US citizenship. See

Anonymous said...

Don - the ex-pat tax sounds mostly unenforceable. If someone were to leave the country for good they already shipped most if not all their wealth abroad before renouncing citizenship. Go try to get an American IRS tax judgement on someone in Costa Rica or the UK.

Anonymous said...

The thing that amazes me about all this is that they are so obvious and blatant about it all. They don't even try to hide what they are doing. The only reason they are able to get away with it is because they have distracted the populace with bread and circuses. Keep the sheeple fat, dumb, and happy, and they will let you do whatever you want.


Anonymous said...

Hey ferfal i've been following you for a long time and its great you are awake to the illuminati/NWO. Well done for writing a great piece highlighting exactly how everything is orchestrated.

Alexander said...

After listening carefully to the 10-minute clip of Soros talking, I fail to see what the issue is. Aside from using the term "New World Order," which of course is a poor choice of words, he's not suggesting anything terrible. I

In fact, his point that the USA will continue to run a horrible deficit as long as the dollar remains the international currency sounds valid.

It's easy to demonize bankers, but what exactly is the problem with his suggestion of a managed decline of the US dollar and the introduction of a new global currency?

More to the point, why would a guy (or guys) with billions of dollars in the bank want to destroy the economy? They are the ones who have the most to lose.